Apple Welcomes Lisa Jackson to Address Environmental Policy
BLOGOur Thoughts on the Important Issues
Apple Welcomes Lisa Jackson to Address Environmental Policy
In an ongoing effort to reduce the company’s environmental impact, Apple recently hired former Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Lisa Jackson as vice president of environmental initiatives. During her 25 years with the EPA, Jackson fought for more air quality regulations and campaigned for greater jurisdiction of the agency. Jackson’s expertise in the field will be welcome at Apple, which has been striving for more environmentally sustainable business practices under the leadership of Tim Cook.
In recent years, Apple has been criticized by several “green” advocacy groups for the company’s lack of supply chain transparency. Apple responded by publishing its incriminating Supplier Responsibility Progress Report for 2013. The release of the report earned Apple much acclaim for its transparency, but did raise many questions regarding the numerous violations. Over 100 of Apple’s 400 suppliers failed to recycle or properly dispose of potentially hazardous waste, and over 120 of the facilities failed to properly monitor air emissions. The list of environmental misconducts continues, and the report also acknowledges 11 factories employing 106 underage workers. Releasing the report was a step in the right direction for the company, but the violations still need to be addressed.
Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to confront the company’s environmental impacts. Since taking over for Steve Jobs in 2011, Cook has propelled Apple to address the company’s environmental effects. Environmental issues have received greater importance within the company in recent years, and Cook has made new commitments to work with suppliers to reduce their environmental impacts. Apple’s new supply chain transparency is only part of the commitment the company has made. Apple facilities, some of which were previously run on coal power, now run on about 75% renewable energy, and the company has set a goal of procuring 100% of its energy from clean energy sources.
Jackson’s experience combating dirty energy and toxic waste will add to the environmental movement happening at Apple. A chemical engineer by trade, she is well versed in these causes of global warming. But, her job description includes only environmental impacts, and includes nothing about the social impacts in the supply chain. The addition of Jackson should reduce Apple’s use of fossil fuels and hazardous chemicals, but it still remains unseen if (and how much) the former EPA Administrator will affect Apple’s social policy.
Do you think Apple made a good move in hiring Jackson? Do you think she will add value to the company’s holistic sustainability efforts, and not just the environmental impacts? Let us know!
Original news credited to Business Green and Triple Pundit
Terminal Tower, 36th floor
50 Public Square
Cleveland, OH 44113
(216) 303 6000 Map It Email Us
Statement from the most senior decision-maker of the organization about relevance of sustainability to the organization and the organization’s strategy for addressing sustainability
Name of the organization
Primary brands, products, and services
Location of organization’s headquarters
Number of countries where the organization operates, and names of countries with significant operations or that are specifically relevant to the sustainability topics covered in the report
Nature of ownership and legal form
Scale of the reporting organization
Total workforce by employment type, employment contract, and region, broken down by gender
Percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
Description of the organization’s supply chain
Significant changes during the reporting period regarding organization's size, structure, ownership, or supply chain
Whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organization
Externally developed economic, environmental, and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or endorses
Memberships in associations and/or national/international advocacy organizations
Entities included in the organization consolidated financial and nonfinancial reports
Process for defining report content
Material aspects identified in the process for defining report content
For each material aspect, the aspect boundary within the organization
For each material aspect, the aspect boundary outside the organization
Explanation of the effect of and reasons for any restatements of information provided in earlier reports
Significant changes from previous reporting periods in the scope and aspect boundaries
List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization
The basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage
The organization’s approach to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group, and an indication of whether any of the engagement was undertaken specifically as part of the report preparation process
Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organization has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting. Report the stakeholder groups that raised each of the key topics and concerns
Date of most recent previous report
Contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents
‘In accordance’ option and GRI Content Index
Policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report
Governance structure of organization, including committees of the highest governance body
The organization’s values, principles, standards, and norms of behavior such as codes of conduct and codes of ethics
Disclosure on Management Approach for Aspect
Coverage of the organization’s defined benefit plan obligations.
Financial assistance received from government.
Significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts.
Total number and rates of new employee hires and employee turnover by age group, gender and region.
Average hours of training per year per employee, by gender and by employee category.
Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews, by gender and by employee category.